Subscribe Now

* You will receive the latest news and updates on your favorite celebrities!

Trending News
WIIKMAN HEADING SOUTH 
15 years ago 3 min read  
AND THEY’RE OFF… LITERALLY 
15 years ago 8 min read  
IT DON’T COME EASY 
15 years ago 6 min read  
WIIKMAN RETURNS 
15 years ago 2 min read  
SOMETHING BRUIN IN PROVIDENCE 
15 years ago 6 min read  
ZABORSKY TO FINLAND 
15 years ago 2 min read  
WHO’S HEADING NORTH 
15 years ago 3 min read  
ROSTERS 
15 years ago 5 min read  

Blog Post

Hartford Wolf Pack

COMMENTARY 

Mitch Beck, 13 years ago 2 2 min read  

New York Rangers Connecticut WhaleThursday night’s 6-2 shellacking by the New York Fish Sticks over the Rangers got me thinking about the similarities between the parent club and their trainees in Hartford.

These two teams are so similar top to bottom in the way that they play, they way they are composed and the type of talent that they have on the roster.

If you look at the way the season has progressed they’ve been practically identical. The only difference being the team’s incredibly bad start as the Wolf Pack prior to taking on their new Whale identity. They’ve had winning streaks of the same length and even at the same times it seems. They have had injury and call-up issues at the same times and are composed of the same kind of players.

Is it any wonder to anyone why both teams are barely hanging on to playoff positions and that both could, with a couple of bad games be making tee-off times rather than play-off plans?

While on the Whale, there are just too many guys that are fluid and in flux to make a definitive call (but we’ll try) on who should stay and who should go, that’s not the case with the parent club.

Break it down this way:

NEW YORK RANGERS

Untouchable:

Lundqvist, Callahan, Stepan, Staal, McDonagh

Godfather-esque…An offer I couldn’t refuse:

Girardi, Anisimov, Dubinsky, Sauer, Biron

Wall Street: How much it costs:

Prust, Boyle, McCabe

I’m listening:

Gaborik

Bubble:

Prospal, Eminger, Zuccarello, Fedotenko

Moving day:

Avery, Boogaard, Christensen, Drury, Frolov, Wolski, Gilroy, Johnson

CONNECTICUT WHALE

Because these are prospects and there are some good ones coming up, they’re harder, but we would break it down this way:

NHL Bound:

(F) Weise, (D) Del Zotto, Valentenko

Keepers:

(G) Grumet-Morris, Talbot, (F) Kolarik, Dupont, Tessier, (D) Parlett, Kundratek,  Nightingale

Bubble:

(F) Grachev, Soryal, DiDiomete, Garlock, Couture, Lemieux (D) Bickel, Niemi,

Newbies:

(G) Missiaen, (F) Grant, McKelvie, Kerbashian

Likely Leaving:

Redden, White, Williams, Newbury, Mitchell

Using these categories, how would you rank them?

Tags #AHL #Connecticut Whale #Henrik Lundqvist #Marc Staal #National Hockey League #New York Islanders #New York Rangers #NHL #Wade Redden #Wolf Pack #Zuccarello
Previous

NO JOKE TONIGHT IN GWINNETT

Next

GIBSONS BEAT CROWES

Mitch Beck
Mitch Beck was a standup comedian and radio personality for over 25 years. His passion for hockey started with Team USA in 1980 when they defeated the Soviets at Lake Placid. He is now working in the hockey industry full-time as a coach and administrator. Mitch has been reporting on the New York Rangers, and exclusively on the Hartford Wolf Pack / Connecticut Whale since 2005.

Related posts

2 Comments

  1. doug

    You obviously have more insight to what’s actually happening with regards to where these players are in their contracts, but from a Whale fan perspective here are my thoughts using your categories:

    NHL Bound: Zuccarello (I think he’ll be sent down b4 play-offs – not built for play-off style hockey) Del Zotto, Newbury

    Keepers: DGM, Talbot, Mitchell, Weise, Kolarik, Dupont, Garlock, Grachev, DiDiomete, Soryal, Nightingale, Parlett, Kundratek, Valentenko

    Bubble: Tessier, McKelvie, Couture, Lemieux, Bickel, Niemi

    Newbies: Kreider, Bourque, McIlrath, Grant, Baldwin

    Likely leaving: Redden,Williams, White, Johnson

    13 years ago Reply
  2. Mitch Beck

    Doug,

    I wasn’t really taking contract status into account just strictly looking at it from a talent perspective. See to me, if a team isn’t doing particularly well in terms of being at the top of the charts, then I’m not as apt to hold onto as many as you are. Granted there are going to be more comings and goings because it’s minor league, but seriously, do you think there are so many strong players that this team can contend for a cup and that there are so many here that the Rangers could go to to fill in holes? It’s essentially the same couple of players over and over, so for me, I’d rather keep building with a core group and go from there.

    To me Weise is likely to be in the NHL next season. Whether it’s with the Rangers or not, no one can be certain, but I think he will be traded.

    Valentenko has the skills but needs more time at the AHL level to work on his positioning. Once he gets that…and can hit the net more with that Howitzer of his, he’s off to NY.

    You listed some newbies that aren’t even here yet so. I was looking at it strictly from who’s already here.

    To me I think Newbury goes elsewhere to get to the NHL. I would love for Newbs to come back but I don’t think he will.

    As far as the rest, I think you’re underestimating Tessier and what he has done for this team.

    13 years ago Reply

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *

Skip to content
%d bloggers like this: